BEAVER VALLEY ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK Buncombe County, North Carolina Bridge Inspection Report (2024)

  1. Your life in data
  2. Bridge Inspections
  3. U.S.
  4. North Carolina
  5. Buncombe
  6. BEAVER VALLEY ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK

Search

Bridge Inspections

Basic Information

County, State: Buncombe County, North CarolinaStructure Number: 000000000210863
Maintenance Responsibility: City or Municipal Highway AgencyOwnership: City or Municipal Highway Agency
Facility Carried By Structure: BEAVER VALLEY ROADFeatures Intersected (Location): BEAVERDAM CREEK (0.05 MI. N. SR2053)
Year Built: 2008Year Reconstructed: N/A
Average Daily Traffic (Year): 50 (2008) with 7% truck trafficFuture Average Daily Traffic (Year): 100 (2040)

NBI Report

NBI Bridge Condition Fair
Inspection Date (Inspection Frequency): June 2022 (Every 24 Months)
Structural Evaluation: 5: Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is
Deck Geometry4: Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is
Underclear/Vertical and Horizontal: N: Not applicable
Deck7: GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
Superstructure5: FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Substructure5: FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Channel/Channel Protection7: Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift.
CulvertsN: Not applicable. Use if structure is not a culvert.
Waterway Adequacy: 5: Bridge deck above roadway approaches. Occasional overtopping of roadway approaches with significant traffic delays.
Approach Roadway Alignment: 8: Equal to present desirable criteria
Bridge PostingNo posting required: Equal to or above legal loads
Scour Critical Bridges: U: Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. Since risk cannot be determined, flag for monitoring during flood events and, if appropriate, closure.
Bridge Railings: 0: Inspected feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Transitions: 0: Inspected feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Approach Guardrail: 0: Inspected feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Approach Guardrail Ends: 0: Inspected feature does not meet currently acceptable standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Historical significance: 5: Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places.
Type of Work Proposed: Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength.
Work Done By: Work to be done by contract
Length of Structure Improvement: None meters
Bridge Improvement Cost $None,000
Roadway Improvement Cost$None,000
Total Project Cost$None,000

More Information

Bypass/Detour Length: 159.00 kilometers
Toll: On free road. The structure is toll-free and carries a toll-free highway.
Functional Class Of Inventory Route: Urban: Local
Lanes On Structure: 2
Lanes Under Structure: 0
Design Load: MS 18 or HS 20
Approach Roadway Width: 4.50 meters
Bridge Median: No median
Skew: 0
Structure Flared: No flare
Navigation Control: No navigation control on waterway (bridge permit not required).
Navigation Vertical Clearance: 0.00 meters
Navigation Horizontal Clearance: 0.00 meters
Structure Open/Posted/Closed: Open, no restriction
Type of Service On Bridge: Highway
Type of Service Under Bridge: Waterway
Kind of Material/Design: Steel
Type of Design/Construction: Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder
Kind of Material/Design: Other
Type of Design/Construction: Other
Number Of Spans In Main Unit: 1
Number Of Approach Spans: 0
Inventory Route Total Horizontal Clearance: 5.60 meters
Length Of Maximum Span: 6.40 meters
Structure Length: 7.60 meters
Left Curb/Sidewalk Width: 0.10 meters
Right Curb/Sidewalk Width: 0.10 meters
Bridge Roadway Width Curb-To-Curb: 5.60 meters
Deck Width/Out-To-Out: 6.00 meters
Operating Rating (Method): 43.50 metric tons(Load Factor (LF))
Inventory Rating (Methon): 32.60 metric tons (Load Factor (LF))
STRAHNET Highway Designation: The inventory route is not a STRAHNET route.
Parallel Structure Designation: No parallel structure exists.
Direction Of Traffic: 2-way traffic
Highway System Of Inventory Route: Inventory Route is not on the NHS
Federal Lands Highways: Not applicable
Deck Structure Type: Wood or Timber
Type of Wearing Surface: Bituminous
Type of Membrane: None
Deck Protection: None
Designated National Network: The inventory route is not part of the national network for trucks.
NBIS Bridge Length: Yes
Minimum Navigation Vertical: None meters

'; popupContent += '

'; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
'+feature.properties.pctnfc+'%of bridges need repair or closed

'; popupContent += '

'; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
Total # of Bridges'+feature.properties.total+'
Bridges need repair or corrective action'+feature.properties.nf+'
Closed'+feature.properties.cl+'
NumberPercent
Rated Poor by USDOT'+feature.properties.poor+''+feature.properties.pctpoor+'
Structurally Deficient'+feature.properties.sd+''+feature.properties.pctsd+'

'; popupContent += '

More

'; return popupContent; }//{"type": "Feature","properties":{"gid":"01001", "name":"Autauga County, AL", "slug":"autauga", "stslug":"alabama", "year":"2018", "total":"117", "nf":"14", "nfc":"14", "cl":"0", "pctnfc":"11.97","poor":"4","pctpoor":"3.42","sd":"4","pctsd":"3.42","fo":"16","pctfo":"13.68","fc":"#e6b414","pc":"#00f014"},"geometry": {"type": "MultiPolygon","coordinates":US01001}} function onBridgeFeature(feature) { if(feature.properties.ost == 'good'){var ost = 'Good/Fair';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'poor'){var ost = 'Meets minimum tolerable limits';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'repair'){var ost = 'Needs repair or corrective action';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'closed'){var ost = 'Closed';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'N/A'){var ost = 'Report Not Available';}; if(feature.properties.bc == 'F'){var bc = 'Fair';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'G'){var bc = 'Good';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'P'){var bc = 'Poor';}; if(feature.properties.sd == 'y'){var sd = '
Structurally Deficient';} else { var sd = '';} if(feature.properties.fo == 'y'){var fo = '
Functionally Obsolete';} else { var fo = '';} var popupContent = "";// var popupContent = "

I started out as a GeoJSON " + feature.geometry.type + ", but now I'm a Leaflet vector!

"; popupContent += '

'+feature.properties.name+'

'; popupContent += '

'; if (feature.properties.idte != ''){popupContent += '';} popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += ''; popupContent += '
NBI Inspection Date'+feature.properties.idte+'
Overall Status'+ost+'
NBI Bridge Condition'+bc+sd+fo+'
Sufficiency Rating'+feature.properties.sr+'
Structural Evaluation'+feature.properties.item67+': '+feature.properties.stru+'
Deck Geometry'+feature.properties.item68+': '+feature.properties.deck+'

'; popupContent += '

More

'; return popupContent; } var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":BridgeJSONData };// var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":[] };mapboxgl.accessToken = 'pk.eyJ1IjoieXB5dW4iLCJhIjoiY2oxcW4ybWhxMDBkMjJxcGVhbDV5cnpzYyJ9.oFQSnOc57xCR7A51OR6-3w'; //ck0flqufl2k1x1cpmupm5sl2yvar map = new mapboxgl.Map({container: 'bridgeMap', style: 'mapbox://styles/ypyun/cj83a8ga5abkq2sqpivw3nrzg',center: [-82.523825,35.64370833], zoom: 14, attributionControl: false, });map.addControl(new mapboxgl.AttributionControl({ compact: false, customAttribution:['Map Icons Collection'] })); var STLINE = {"type":"FeatureCollection", "features":[ {"type":"Feature","properties":{"GEO_ID":"37021","NAME":"State","VAL":0,"VALstr":"","VALper":"","FC":"#FFF",},"geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":US37021 }}, ]}; // ptype detailmap.on('style.load', function() { var layers = map.getStyle().layers; var firstSymbolId; for (var i = 0; i < layers.length; i++) { if (layers[i].type === 'symbol') { firstSymbolId = layers[i].id; break; } } map.addSource('bridges', {type: 'geojson', data: CntyBridgesJSON }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_green.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('green', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_yellow.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('yellow', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_red.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('red', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_black.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('black', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_white.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('white', image); }); map.addLayer({"id": "bridge_point", "type": "symbol", "source": "bridges", "filter":["all", ["==","m","y"]], "layout": {"visibility":"visible", "icon-image": '{grade}', 'icon-allow-overlap':true},}); map.on('click', "bridge_point", function (e) {new mapboxgl.Popup({ offset: 14 }).setLngLat(e.lngLat).setHTML(onBridgeFeature(e.features[0])).addTo(map);}); map.on('mouseenter', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = 'pointer'; }); map.on('mouseleave', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = '';}); map.addLayer({ "id": "stline", "type": "line", "source": { "type": "geojson", "data":STLINE }, "paint": {'line-color':"#333", 'line-opacity':0.9, 'line-width': 2.0 }},firstSymbolId);}); map.addControl(new mapboxgl.NavigationControl(), 'top-left');map.flyTo({ center: [-82.523825,35.64370833], zoom: 14, speed: 3, curve: 1, easing: function (t) { return t; } });

BEAVER VALLEY ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK Buncombe County, North Carolina Bridge Inspection Report (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arline Emard IV

Last Updated:

Views: 6798

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (72 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arline Emard IV

Birthday: 1996-07-10

Address: 8912 Hintz Shore, West Louie, AZ 69363-0747

Phone: +13454700762376

Job: Administration Technician

Hobby: Paintball, Horseback riding, Cycling, Running, Macrame, Playing musical instruments, Soapmaking

Introduction: My name is Arline Emard IV, I am a cheerful, gorgeous, colorful, joyous, excited, super, inquisitive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.